Categories
Economics Social Evolution

The day after the financial crash…

We have been there before. October 30th, 1929…October 20th, 1987…September 30th, 2008. On these days we had as much food on the shelves of our stores as we did the day before. We had as many suitable homes capable of sheltering us from harsh weather. We still had jobs and meaningful work to do. What changed?

The financial markets were desperately short of money. The availability and quality of resources that made our lives worth living had been unaffected. But the severe shortage of cash led over time to the devastating waste of enormous resources, destroyed by neglect. Crops shriveled in the fields; the assembly line stopped producing products; homes were abandoned; jobs were lost; savings were lost; marriages were destroyed; broad access to higher education was eliminated; All because money was in too few hands. Consider for a moment that we destroyed billions of dollars worth of homes in America in the residential real estate collapse of 2007-2009…all due to abandonment caused by a shortage of money.

Money has become a surrogate for resources. If you have money, you can access resources. And if you lose your money, your access to resources are taken away. The thing is…money is not resources. Money is a totally arbitrary way to determine access to resources. Would any of us have the money and therefore the access to resources we have if we were born to the lowest caste in India? Or to a single impoverished mother in rural Appalachia? Yet we compound the randomness of birth with the use of money as a surrogate for resources to determine who is able to reach their full potential.

Given this reality, who amongst the fortunate can honestly claim they earned the privilege they enjoy at the expense of the less fortunate? In the parable of Lazarus and the rich man, we are all the rich man. According to the Worldwatch Institute, 12% of the world’s population living in North America and Western Europe accounts for 60% of private consumption spending, while the one-third living in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa accounts for only 3.2%. Our disproportionate consumption of global resources creates the conditions for mass deprivation of billions of people, few of which have the opportunity to reach their full potential.

The system of global economics that produce these inhumane conditions is not sustainable. We are experiencing resource depletion, destabilization of political institutions, a global refugee crisis involving mass migration to more fortunate countries, radicalized populations fueling global terrorism, and the exploding addictions to drugs and alcohol as more and more people self-medicate to cope with the inadequacy of available choices to improve their lives.

Our choice is clear: change to a full access, sustainable, resource management based, global economy, or degrade into a modern dystopia where fewer resources are available to sustain fewer people.

Categories
Economics

When money no longer exists…

What separates you and me from the Walton family, Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, and every extremely wealthy person on the planet? Cash…specifically, the huge accumulation of cash. And with their huge accumulation of cash comes influence and control over an extraordinary portion of our finite resources.

Now imagine an economy where money no longer exists. We no longer compete to accumulate cash in order to access the resources we need to sustain ourselves and our families. If we all have the same claim on our finite resources, we all have an interest to make sure our access provides for a high quality, mutually fulfilling, and sustainable living condition. Individual accumulation of resources is no longer necessary because everyone will have all the resources we can use to reach our full potential.

From our birth, we will have full access to the complete body of human knowledge. We will be free to pursue our educational passions and select our vocations based solely on our highest aspirations. Human innovation is unleashed to the maximum potential because it is informed by the accumulation of human knowledge and unhindered by limited access to our finite resources. Since our quality of life will be a function of our total contributions, all of us will be motivated to add new contributions to improve our living conditions. Imagine how productive we each could be if we all worked in the field of our highest, well informed aspirations? But what about the wide range of mundane vocations necessary for modern living? This is the appropriate application for automated technology. By maximizing the use of automated technology to fulfill the myriad of mundane functions, each of us are free to turn our focus on the areas of our maximum contribution.

The latest innovations are no longer exclusive to those few who can afford to pay for it. All goods and services are provided to the highest level of quality and efficiency in order to maximize our contribution to our mutual well-being and minimize waste.

A successful life will no longer be measured by who accumulates more resources to themselves, but by who contributes most to the quality of life of the global community.

Categories
Economics

Knowing is not enough

Talk to the best and brightest people and ask “what are the keys to their success?” Invariably they say something most of us already know…hard work…diligent study…thinking outside the box…buying low and selling high…

blah…Blah…BLAH!

We walk away assuming they are being coy with their treasured secrets to success. The thing is…they actually are telling the truth. But you say “if that’s all it takes to be successful, I would be very successful. I already know all those keys to success.” And now for our Yoda moment: It’s not what you know, instead it IS what you do that determines your success.

Consider investing. The first rule of investing is “buy low and sell high.” Yet, when scandal hits a company…the stock usually plummets. Why? Because an increasing number of investors are choosing to sell low. And when a company posts record profits…the stock price skyrockets. Why? Because an increasing number of investors are buying high. Now take Warren Buffett, America’s greatest investor. On Black Monday, October 19th, 1987, the stock market posted the deepest crash since the Stock Market crash of 1929. On this day, on paper, Warren Buffett lost over a billion dollars. And while the broad market was selling everything at increasingly lower prices, Warren Buffett bought the holdings that would drive his return on investment for the next decade and beyond. Everyone trading stock that day knew to buy low and sell high, but only a few actually did it. The key to Warren Buffett’s investment success is he lives the maxim, even when the rest of the market is running in the other direction.

The simple lesson here is to make sure the best we know is reflected in the most we do.

Now ask yourself…Do I do unto others as I would have them do to me? Do I live the values I hope to receive from others? Do I give first what I want to receive? Am I the change that I expect in others? Do I listen with the same desire as I want to be heard?

Now imagine what life would be like if we did.

Categories
Economics Politics

What divides us?

Let us consider our organizing American characteristics: independence, ordered liberty, self-interest, free market economics, and currency as a medium of exchange. Each of these characteristics encourage differentiating individuals from each other.

As an independent person, I am free to choose my own values. My liberty is only limited by laws designed to prevent me from imposing on the liberty of other people.

At the heart of free market economics is the utilitarian principle of individual actors making market choices based on their individual preferences (self-interest). Based on these choices, market prices are set for all goods and services in the global economy, thereby distinguishing consumers by their capacity to pay.

Accordingly, the quality of every good and service we buy is tied to how much money we have. Since most consumers cannot afford the very best quality goods and services, fortunes are made selling substandard quality to the broadest part of the market (i.e. Walmart).

Under these circumstances, well-being has become a function of fierce competition to accumulate money. And as a result, the universal desire to provide for ourselves and our families is reduced to creating a zero-sum environment of inhuman, non-sustainable inequality.